It's
time to fess up. My wife and I have been debating the pros and cons
of converting to the right. We feel so, well so left out. Harper
has Canada, and may just win another term as majority Prime Minister
next year. He has brilliant strategists working full time to take
advantage of situational variables that affect political orientation;
there being a good deal of evidence suggesting that environmental
factors such as threat can and do produce ideological shifts. Then
there are the Americans who have recently filled their Houses with
republicans whose conduct is definitely more orderly, conventional,
and better organized. In our great province of Manitoba western
conservative idealism is snarling the smiling faces of our present
somewhat left leaning NDP government, it seems these novelty seeking
trade-unionists may be short lived.
With
our aging Canadian population, 30% of whom die with some sort of
dementia, we decided to do a mind experiment to see if we could
convince my wife, who is blessed with moderate dementia, of some
conservative precepts. It took two minutes to affirm in her mind
that the earth was flat and that God had created it 6000 years ago.
This state of rapture lasted less than ten minutes before she lost
her new gained wisdom, however we reasoned it would be just long
enough to get her in and out of a polling booth. We could walk home
hand in hand from the next major election knowing we where part of
the efficacious right-wing majority.
We
were somewhat concerned over a major study we saw on the association
between political inclination and obesity, citing Shin
ME1 and McCarthy WJ,
which examined results from the 2012 presidential election in the
United States. After controlling for poverty rate, percent African
American and Latino populations, educational attainment, and spatial
autocorrelation in the error term, they found that higher
county-level obesity prevalence rates were associated with higher
levels of support for the 2012 Republican Party presidential
candidate. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23994157
However,
considering the high level of support for our universal health care
system among all Canadians, we decided they would do their best to
keep us functioning well into our nineties no matter how many donuts
we began consuming.
For
myself it has been somewhat of a struggle to come to terms with
giving up my lack
of order, tolerance for ambiguity, and openness to experience to
embrace death anxiety, system threat, and perceptions of a dangerous
world, which each contribute independently to conservatism verses
liberalism.
Citing The
Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives by John T. Jost, Samuel D.
Gosling, and Jeff Potter
in my nogginal ambiance, differences between liberals and
conservatives with respect to openness play out in terms of nonverbal
behaviour and interpersonal interaction style. Liberals are more
expressive, smile more, and are more engaged in conversation with
confederates. Conservatives do not generally behave in ways that
reflect greater conscientiousness. In the context of the experimental
situation, conservatives behave in a more detached and disengaged
manner in general. Although this behaviour is not indicative of
conscientiousness, it does reflect the kind of withdrawn, reserved,
inhibited, and even rigid interaction style that many theorists have
associated with conservatism over the years.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x/abstract
In
order to undo my liberal open-minded, creative, curious, and novelty
seeking adventurous side, I have decided to take seriously the
threats posed on our country by terrorist extremists and actually to
listen to our dear Prime Minister's Action Ads. Forthwith, citing
Bonanno
& Jost, 2006, Jost,
2006, and Jost
etal., 2008, since there is a good deal of evidence suggesting
that environmental factors such as threat can and do produce
ideological shifts, and I am going to make a concerted effort to
introduce these into my life. The
uncertainty - threat model of political conservatism, which posits
that psychological needs to manage uncertainty and threat such as
need for order, intolerance of ambiguity, and lack of openness to
experience will come to prevail in my conscientiousness as a workable
threat management system. Results from structural equation models
provide consistent support for the hypothesis that uncertainty
avoidance contributes independently to conservatism. What a relief.
This
is good by George. We're going to dash this off in a Christmas
letter to all our long lost friends and relatives to show them our
transmogrification so they no longer have to have the great
embarrassment of deleting us as black sheep from their mailing lists.
It's going to be a good year.
No comments :
Post a Comment